Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: We Can Change The World

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785

    Unhappy We Can Change The World

    It is important to have some idea of what the nature of the world governance has been before we get into trying to change it. I will present only a small part of the situation in this book because I think I have presented enough of it in other books. There is no boogeyman and probably no one person and maybe even no one group of people who are at the top of the dung heap that has put nations over people and people over their own mothers and sisters. Paradigm pundits call me a ‘conspiracy theorist’ and those looking for answers who have found one portion of the elite who they blame for the situation will often call me an agent of the elite.


    Rothschild versus Lincoln:

    Pierre Belmont and Judah Benjamin are most interesting studies in the matter of the War Between the States. Belmont was Democratic National Chairman and very much the Rothschild operative as he reported through Salomon Rothschild.

    “The election of Abraham Lincoln in November 1860 was seen by Salomon as merely one step closer to the abyss, and he had nothing but contempt for the new President.

    … he is not up to his position and the Republicans themselves regret having nominated him. He rejects all forms of compromise and thinks only of repression by force of arms. He has the appearance of a peasant and can only tell bar-room stories. The other day I saw one of his supporters, who had been to see him at Springfield to chat with him about the situation. He found him seated, legs on the mantelpiece, in shirtsleeves, hat on his head, amusing himself by spitting great gobs of tobacco juice that he extracted from his quid. After conversation which shed no light on the way Mr. Lincoln viewed things, the visitor – who is one of the Republican leaders – went away very disappointed in the future president. In this country, people do not take umbrage at nonentities; the greatest claim to public favour is to be unknown.” (1)
    Belmont was not in agreement with Salomon as regards the maintaining of the Union and he went over his head to the other Rothschilds in Europe. The full extent of their ability to play both ends against the middle seems largely unconsidered by most historians. The same was true when they were being ousted by converted Jews and the Péreires in the time of Napoleon. The same is true today but you will have to read all my books and many of the source material to get to the point where you can be sure this is at least partially true.

    “Up until the mid-century the Rothschilds entrusted to agents their business in distant lands. There might be on-the-spot financiers or merchants, or trusted bank employees sent abroad after years at New Court or Rue Lafitte. Whoever they were, their positions carried enormous responsibility and prestige, as well as the potential for considerable personal profit.

    Rothschilds were in the vanguard of overseas development. As new colonies were opened up in Africa, and the newly created nations of South America sought to expand their economies, the agents of the Paris or London house were there to buy up mining concessions, finance railway building or provide state loans. They owned or had major shareholdings in Central American ironworks, North American canal construction companies and a multiplicity of other concerns. They became the major importers of bullion from the newly discovered goldfields; in 1855 the London band established its own gold refinery on Tower Hill in premises recently vacated by the Royal Mint.” (2)
    Thus we must look to the Rockefellers and J. P. Morgan and the control of technology through General Electric and many other things which we have done. My own comments on the Peking Man explorations are already too far from the normal perception of the man named Teilhard by even suggesting he was catering to his sponsor. But it would not be the first time that a person was attacked by such an organization (as he often was, and you can see in comments we have quoted from the Catholic Encyclopedia) in order to make a more credible spokesman and agent for their real cause. There is no good reason to further debate Teilhard except for the facts we are about to relay in reference to the Rockefeller Foundation. The Yale connection and the Skull & Bones Society founded by a great Merovingian name (Russell) and the Opium Wars are all related as well. It would serve the reader well to wait and read before making decisions about these things.

    “TRANSFORMATION OF THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION

    Now a financial problem loomed. The Rockefeller Foundation grant that supported the digging would run out in April 1929. So in January Black wrote the directors, asking them to support the Zhoukoudian excavations by creating a Cenozoic Research Laboratory (the Cenozoic includes the periods from the Paleocene to the Holocene). In April, Black received the funds he desired.

    Just a few years before, Rockefeller Foundation officials had actively discouraged Black from becoming too involved in paleoanthropological research. Now they were backing him to the hilt, setting up an institute specifically devoted to searching for remains of fossil human ancestors {The religious tides were changing as their 'Bible Narrative' approach shepherded by Frederick T. Gates a prominent Baptist educator and founder of their Foundation was seen as less influential in bending minds than what is coming.}. Why had the Rockefeller Foundation so changed its attitude toward Black and his work? This question bears looking into, because the financial contribution of foundations would turn out to be vital to human evolution research carried out by scientists like Black {The author of this quote is a historian who is not aware of the nature of the Skull & Bones Society or other Merovingian import.}. Foundation support would also prove important in broadcasting the news of the finds and their significance to the waiting world.

    As Warren Weaver, a scientist and Rockefeller Foundation official, wrote in 1967: 'In a perfect world an idea could be born, nourished, developed and made known to everyone, criticized and perfected, and put to good use without the crude fact of financial support ever entering in to the process. Seldom, if ever, in the practical world in which we live does this occur.'
    cont'd
    Last edited by R_Baird; 11-24-2015 at 12:17 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    For Weaver, biological questions were of the highest importance. He regarded the highly publicized particle accelerators and space explorations programs as something akin to scientific fads. He added: 'The opportunities not yet rigorously explored lie in the understanding of the nature of living things.' It seemed clear in 1932, when the Rockefeller Foundation launched its quarter-century program in that area, that the biological and medical sciences were ready ‘for a friendly invasion by the physical sciences... the tools are now available for discovering, on the most disciplined and precise level of molecular actions, how man's central nervous system really operates, how he thinks, learns, remembers, and forgets… Apart from the fascination of gaining some knowledge of the nature of the mind-brain-body relationship, the practical values in such studies are potentially enormous. Only thus may we gain information about our behavior of the sort that can lead to wise and beneficial control.'

    It thus became clear that at the same time the Rockefeller Foundation was channeling funds into human evolution research in China, it was in the process of developing an elaborate plan to fund biological research with a view to developing methods to effectively control human behavior.

    Over the past few decades, science has developed a comprehensive cosmology that explains the origins of human beings as the culmination of a 4-billion year process {Make that 5 now} of chemical and biological evolution on this planet, which formed in the aftermath of the Big Bang, the event that marked the beginning of the universe, founded upon particle physics and astronomical observations suggesting we live in an expanding cosmos, is thus inextricably connected with the theory of the biochemical evolution of all life forms, including human beings. The major foundations, especially the Rockefeller Foundation, provided key funding {Eli Lilly was a huge supporter of archaeology with hands-on experience in the Hopewell area.} for the initial research supporting this materialistic cosmology, which has for all practical purposes pushed God and the soul into the realm of mythology - at least in the intellectual centers of modern civilization." (3)
    A history of the Rockefeller/Rothschild connection back to the Benjaminites and up to the founding of the Federal Reserve Board is a most intriguing study. The key word is 'intrigue'. We will have occasion to mention them some more but this particular insight seemed hard enough evidence of the things we speculate about with other evidence in the field of mind-control devices, Black Ops, the Opium War(s) and a great deal that everyone should know in order to try to make the future of their children as positive as possible. There is so much more I could include in this book but perhaps this is enough for now.

    GERMAN LAW PROTECTED ‘RIGHTS’ MORE THAN US LAW:

    It was not until after the Nuremberg Trials that the rest of the world put the kinds of protections in place that had already been in place for a long time in Germany but we are found accusing Germans of the heinous crimes we actually lead. It is just like Mackenzie King in Canada who was backing Hitler and his programs in many areas, along with other blue bloods like the Bushes and their bosses the Merovingians.

    “Beginning in 1907, with legislation passed in Indiana, forced sterilization on the basis of eugenic doctrine began spreading across the United States, with finally thirty states having such laws on the books. In this century, upwards of 50,000 Americans have been sterilized by order of the state. {Today we have drugs that reduce the libido or sex drive and potency of the less fortunate and victimized masses. These drugs and lobotomies which are still performed in Canada serve the same purposes.} The constitutionality of such compulsion was upheld in 1927, when the case Buck vs. Bell went before the Supreme Court. With only one dissent, the court said, in a majority opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:

    ‘It is better for the world, if instead of waiting to execute offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.’

    The court, in other words, went beyond saying that a person is guilty until proven innocent; it declared that hypothetical persons were presumed guilty of criminal intent even before being conceived and may not be brought into existence. The 1927 decision has never been overturned, and is still a part of the law of the land.

    After World War II, German lawyers defending those accused of being Nazi war criminals for having forcibly sterilized two million people as a part of Nazi racial doctrine pointed to the sterilization laws in America and the 1927 Supreme Court decision as justification for their clients' conduct.

    In his recent book, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism and National Socialism, Stefan Kühl traces the relationships between the Nazi racial theorists and members of the American eugenics movement in the 1930s. American eugenicists and German advocates of "racial hygiene" were already communicating and sharing ''scientific'' information before the First World War. The conflict in Europe, and particularly American entry into the war against Germany, broke off all such ties. But shortly after the war's end, contacts began to reemerge, with their American colleagues being especially helpful in getting German eugenicists accepted back into their community of scholars.

    Throughout the 1920s, the German proponents of racial sterilization drew upon the arguments of their American counterparts, using data the American eugenicists had collected to justify the case for distinguishing between "superior" and "inferior" racial types; they also made the case that America was more enlightened and progressive in its racial policies, since numerous American states had passed sterilization laws, while German law was "backward" in its narrow defense of individual rights that frustrated equivalent German legislation.

    With Hitler's coming to power in 1933, Germany's racial hygienists came into their own, with institutes for race science and research being established or expanded. They solicited articles by many of the leading American eugenicists for their "scholarly" journals, translated many of their works into German, and gave them wide distribution. The Nazis used these American books and articles to demonstrate that they were not alone in the world in advocating compulsory racial improvement and purity.

    A number of American eugenicists happily cooperated. Harry L. Laughlin, who authored the "model" sterilization law for Virginia that was then copied by several other states, saw his proposals explicitly implemented in Germany's 1933 Hereditary Health Law, that prohibited racial intermarriage and codified forced sterilization in the new Germany. As a tribute, the University of Heidelberg awarded Laughlin an honorary degree in 1936, which he enthusiastically accepted.

    Even in the late 1930s and early 1940s Science Articles, some American eugenics publications refused to criticize Nazi race policy in general or legal persecution of the Jews in particular. Some of the leading eugenicists argued that to do so would be to unjustifiably mix science with politics.” (4)

    The leader of the House Un-American Activities lynching was John Stennis who kept the real Holocaust(s) alive in his words ‘They Killed our Savior’ long after Nuremberg where the Nazis were not allowed to mount certain Synarchy defenses that might have educated the world about the truth of what happened in Germany (and Russia).
    Last edited by R_Baird; 03-01-2016 at 12:55 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    Einstein was no dummy even though he quit school because it did not teach thinking. He called for an end to standing armies and lesser people argue this would lead to worldwide terrorist domination. Actually THAT is what nations do to each other and we should have a police force to ensure no nation develops things like weaponized viruses and biologics (which they do even though signing documents saying they won't ETC.). In fact a world police force might even be able to defend the rights of women and children or other useful things which might put an end to huge expenditures on drugs to make people malleable. In a generation or two it might make extremist war-mongering which includes promises such as 72 virgins or the rape and pillage associated with every war a thing of the past. Police personnel could learn to teach tolerance - probably better than schools or religions have done. Einstein worked hard for Peace and the money spent on other things like education has no real destruction of assets and a much higher economic multiplier of 15 versus 7.

    http://www.ppu.org.uk/people/einstein.html

    The Club of Rome has papers from experts that show we can produce far more with less manpower and new technologies will make this even more so. They also have spoken about the lack of basic terms that cross all cultures or languages and allow us to talk about principles for co-operation and peace. The biggest stumbling block appears to be the people who say there is no plan or conspiracy. If there is no plan let's insist we have a plan to maximize the opportunity humanity and other life on earth does actually have. I back Teilhard de Chardin's call for a 'Conspiracy of LOVE'. I know less taxation or illicit and immoral re-distribution of assets will occur through proper management including a minimum guaranteed income such as J. K. Galbraith called for in his Nobel Prize nominated work A negative income tax is similar.

    The Club of Rome is not an evil reptoid shape-shifting conglomeration of elites despite what idiots tell you. The Club of Athens calls for a change to Sovereign Rights and proves the old paradigm or Westphalian Order (yes, a religion runs national concerns through existing laws that protect that religion from taxation or accountability for their pedophilia, misogyny etc.) that maintained Divine Rights for Kings through the creation of nations and Manifest Destiny ideas of self-serving ecclesiasts and bureaucrats. I can't think of too many more important initiatives than making nations unable to abuse citizens or spy on each other as a run up to war or the theft of intellectual property. Here are a few points worth considering from the Club of Rome.

    The Programme focused on five “clusters” of related issues within the overall conceptual framework of A New Path for World Development:



    1.Environment and Resources: This cluster relates climate change, peak oil, ecosystems and water. Radical and rapid social and economic transformations will be needed to avert runaway climate change and ecological breakdown;



    2. Globalisation: This cluster relates interdependence, distribution of wealth and income, demographic change, employment, trade and finance. Rising inequalities and imbalances associated with the present path of globalisation risk the breakdown of the world economic and financial systems;



    3. World Development: This cluster relates sustainable development, demographic growth, poverty, environmental stress, food production, health and employment. The scandal of abiding poverty, deprivation, inequity and exclusion in a wealthy world must be corrected;



    4. Social Transformation: This cluster relates social change, gender equity, values and ethics, religion and spirituality, culture, identity and behaviour. The values and behaviour on which the present path of world development is based must change if peace and progress are to be preserved within the tightening human and environmental limits;



    5. Peace and Security: This cluster relates justice, democracy, governance, solidarity, security and peace. The present path of world development risks alienation, polarization, violence and conflict; the preservation of peace is vital in itself but is also a precondition for progress and for the resolution of the issues which threaten the future.
    Last edited by R_Baird; 11-24-2015 at 12:22 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    Jesus said: "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the kingdom is in heaven, then the birds of heaven will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is inside you and it is outside you. When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will understand that you are the children of the living father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you dwell in poverty, and you are poverty.’” (From The Gospel of Thomas found in Dag Hammadi in the postwar period.)

    “Do not put yourself in front of your Self.” – Mayan saying.

    "All of us are born for a reason, but all of us don't discover why. Success in life has nothing to do with what you gain in life or accomplish for yourself. It's what you do for others." - Danny Thomas

    "I'm sorry, but I don't want to be an emperor. That's not my business. I don't want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help everyone if possible - Jew, Gentile - black man - white." - Charlie Chaplin, born the same year as Hitler.

    "The other shape, If shape it might be call'd, that shape had none, Distinguishable in member, joint, or limb; Or substance might be call'd that shadow seem'd; For each seem'd either; black it stood as night, Fierce as ten furies, terrible as Hell, And shook a dreadful dart; what seem'd his head The likeness of a kingly crown had on. Satan was now at hand; and from his seat The monster, moving onward, came as fast With horrid strides; Hell trembled as he strode." -- John Milton

    “Reality is a shared Hallucination.” – Howard Bloom

    "I have had dreams, and I have had nightmares. I overcame the nightmares because of my dreams." - Dr. Jonas Salk Discovered The First Vaccine Against Polio

    “Fear not, nor be dismayed at the appearance that is darkness, at the disguise that is evil, at the empty cloak that is death, for you have picked these for your challenges. They are the stones on which you choose to whet the keen edge of your spirit. Know that ever about you stands the reality of love, and each moment you have the power to transform your world by what you have learned.” – One by Richard Bach who is the son of Marcus Bach and the erudite knowledge which came therefrom is in all of his books.

    "Every Cause has its Effect; every Effect has its Cause; everything happens according to Law; Chance is but a name for Law not recognized; there are many planes of causation, but nothing escapes the Law." - The Kybalion

    “What things soever ye desire, when ye pray believe that ye received them, and ye shall have them.” – Mark 11: 24 quoting Jesus see also Psalms 82: 6 and John 10: 34

    Speaking at the meeting of the IMF in the year 2000, Vaclav Havel emphasised that the “the crucial task is to fundamentally strengthen a system of universally shared moral standards that will make it impossible, on a truly global scale, for the various rules to be time and again circumvented with still more ingenuity than had gone into their invention.”

    “Art is a dialogue we have always carried out with the unknown. We have come to distinguish the contours of the unknown through the unconscious, through religion and magic and we may soon begin to understand such totally modern emotions as the feeling that we belong to the future, that our civilization is the sum of others.” – Andre Malraux.

    The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H.L. Mencken

    "The clergy converted the simple teachings of Jesus into an engine for enslaving mankind and adulterated by artificial constructions into a contrivance to filch wealth and power to themselves...these clergy, in fact, constitute the real Anti-Christ.” – Thomas Jefferson

    As this author says (somewhat tongue in cheek) all books of the Bible and this cult are corrupt. Savior = save your ($$)

    http://www.truthcontest.com/insights...s-dogma/#page2


    Aristotle referred to happiness as the most we can achieve. Demons and gods were interchangeable in the time of Homer when people had far less institutionalized manipulation of their thoughts and soulful understandings. If mankind doesn't get these hallucinations or CONstructs out of the ether and away from the dreams that ordinary people can be affected by - will mankind ever shake the hold of cults and religion? The supposed quote from Jesus in the above link is what Futurescape says machines can allow us to do now. We can "manfest" reality or "creatively realize" what occurs. The people controlling the machines will have more power than all the priests of antiquity.
    Last edited by R_Baird; 12-30-2015 at 12:09 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    Many people think that Islamists are extremists (including me) but in most cases the group they call extremists are fighting for poor people who have little chance of fair treatment. The US is actually supporting the more extreme and feudal sects like the Wahhabi who control Saudi Arabia. Former CIA Director Richard Woolsey and Bill Bennett the education czar went on tour together in the early part of this millennium saying the Wahhabi and Mubaraks were next on the list of targets after their former agent Saddam. Here we have Noam Chomsky being interviewed about secular and religious inter and disconnects. Then we will have Jihad v. McWorld.

    http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/200704--.htm

    In Jihad v. McWorld Barber sees hope if mankind can act locally and structures of bureaucracies and ecclesiasts allowed it. I often find hatred and prejudice disappears when people actually talk. That brings us back to what the Club of Rome says about words for Peace. Some people think Shalom means Peace. It is used that way by people who don't know it means Peace through domination or after victory. Futurists including the Tofflers were champions of bringing society to a point where responsible government and the resources met close to where they actually need to be. That would lead to fewer Nationalistic agendas or major ecclesiastical issues. For example if the people of Austria voted to end the ban on abortion (which they did despite being Catholic) that is what would be. People there would not have fears or worries about sins and demonic projections from their church, as much. Cities would have the taxes their people now give to nations and those cities know better what their people need. Would that mean nations had no money to make war or spy on their citizens - I think it would over time. But would nations and the bureaucrats stop the mind control agenda? And if the mind control is the only way to counteract pulpit-pounding fundamentalism - where do we go? Mars might soon be an option if Elon Musk's SpaceX plans solve the issue of space debris wrecking the space craft - which I think can be done but I question whether the soon to launch project will have done.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad_vs._McWorld
    Last edited by R_Baird; 01-19-2016 at 11:19 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    Perhaps we MUST change the world through the new technologies in some dramatic way. The longevity brought about by medical advances alone might force it - and people will not give up their inalienable rights easily. I refer to the right to force society to care for kids by the unable or worse. I refer to the right to worship NONsense and wage war. Many such things make me willing to have some measure of responsible implantation of new thought paradigms. Maybe we can populate adjacent bandwidth universes with the effluent and uneducated?

    "We may be a simulation ... creations of some supreme, or super-being," muses Britain's astronomer royal, Sir Martin Rees, a staunch advocate of the multiverse theory. [6]

    This theory is stoutly supported in a publication entitled: “ARE YOU LIVING IN A COMPUTER SIMULATION?” [5] BY NICK BOSTROM, Department of Philosophy, Oxford University HTML

    This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed.


    Our Virtual Reality Universe Written by Ian O'Neill Universe Today HTML [7] reflects on Brian Whitworths hypothesis;

    What if the Universe was in fact a simulation? A product of some information processor, creating space and time, energy and matter? What if the Big Bang was the whole simulation booting up, beginning billions of years of space and time calculations? Can we possibly understand our consciousness as a subroutine in an advanced number crunching machine? A new paper published by the Centre for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, University of Auckland, asks us to keep an open mind and suggests if we look at the complexity of physical laws of our known universe, many paradoxes may be explained if we view our physical reality as a virtual reality.


    If we were living in a Virtual Reality; how would we know? If this is in fact some artificial reality created by a technology; who created it; what is the technology composed of and how to we test this theory?
    Last edited by R_Baird; 01-19-2016 at 11:16 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    “All things truly wicked start from innocence.”
    ― Ernest Hemingway

    “More generally, as I shall repeat in Chapter 8, one of the truly bad effects of religion is that it teaches us that it is a virtue to be satisfied with not understanding.”
    ― Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion

    “Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn.”
    ― Benjamin Franklin

    “It's an universal law-- intolerance is the first sign of an inadequate education. An ill-educated person behaves with arrogant impatience, whereas truly profound education breeds humility.”
    ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    “That which we manifest is before us; we are the creators of our own destiny. Be it through intention or ignorance, our successes and our failures have been brought on by none other than ourselves.”
    ― Garth Stein

    “He knows nothing; and he thinks he knows everything. That points clearly to a political career.”
    ― George Bernard Shaw, Major Barbara

    “There is nothing in the record of the past two years when both Houses of Congress have been controlled by the Republican Party which can lead any person to believe that those promises will be fulfilled in the future. They follow the Hitler line - no matter how big the lie; repeat it often enough and the masses will regard it as truth.”
    ― John F. Kennedy

    “Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.”
    ― Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man

    “Education is a system of imposed ignorance.”
    ― Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media

    “I examined the poets, and I look on them as people whose talent overawes both themselves and others, people who present themselves as wise men and are taken as such, when they are nothing of the sort.

    From poets, I moved to artists. No one was more ignorant about the arts than I; no one was more convinced that artists possessed really beautiful secrets. However, I noticed that their condition was no better than that of the poets and that both of them have the same misconceptions. Because the most skillful among them excel in their specialty, they look upon themselves as the wisest of men. In my eyes, this presumption completely tarnished their knowledge. As a result, putting myself in the place of the oracle and asking myself what I would prefer to be — what I was or what they were, to know what they have learned or to know that I know nothing — I replied to myself and to the god: I wish to remain who I am.

    We do not know — neither the sophists, nor the orators, nor the artists, nor I— what the True, the Good, and the Beautiful are. But there is this difference between us: although these people know nothing, they all believe they know something; whereas, I, if I know nothing, at least have no doubts about it. As a result, all this superiority in wisdom which the oracle has attributed to me reduces itself to the single point that I am strongly convinced that I am ignorant of what I do not know.”

    ― Socrates
    Last edited by R_Baird; 12-30-2015 at 12:15 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    Re: As Colombian Oil Money Flowed To Clintons, State Department Took No Action To Prevent Labor Violations (Reads todays media headlines)


    There are many inter-connected issues in the matter of violence. Religion promotes violence and is a tool for social engineers as Francis Fukayama said in The End of History and The Last Man. He was lauded by Bill Clinton as he left the State Dept as a Policy Manager to go upstairs to the Rand Corporation.



    In this article you will see Clinton apologizing to Mexico for the increased violence there and throughout Latin America. His apology relates to the efforts of Bush Sr. and others. To know what the CIA did for drug running and the Medellin cartel will take a lot of reading. The reason for Vietnam and Afghanistan warfare is connected with drugs (See the Russell Foundation connection to the Opium Wars and Bush's Skull and Bones) and what Eisenhower warned us about in his Military-Industrial complex speech. Then consider Bush's father in the Supreme Court case over Trading with the Enemy - Hitler. Look into his association on the Board of Carlyle Corporation with the Bin Ladins before public outcry finally forced his resignation. Why is he called The Teflon President? I could go on but suffice it to say Bill Clinton is not the boogeyman even though he was Illuminized by Bilderberg/Rhodes connections. In fact the Committees of 300 set up with Rhodes money and exposed by Professor Quigley do good work - even according to Quigley.



    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...War-drugs.html

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    Council of Six (borrowed from the Keltic Councils and Dirfines)

    The head of the Club of Rome has said that the major issue that prevents World Peace is the matter of terminology or differences in what people mean across different cultures. I have no illusions about having devised a fool proof proposal here - but it would be nice if the dialogue existed and not until it does exist will there be much hope for real change.

    1. Love should be the guiding force in all actions. Any act that diminishes one life diminishes all life and the decisions of man must respect all life, though the greater good may sometimes lessen the potential of other life (e.g. when we eat) it should always be in view of a greater harmonizing growth of God (the 'forces of nature', Allah etc.). This principle shall be known as ecumenicism.

    2. Laws shall exist for everyone equally. Nations will not have double-standards of prejudicial content against women, for themself against other nations, or for any possible patronage or preference. Criminals will not be able to hide in sovereign nations to avoid the World Court's laws.

    3. In recognition of the immortality of the soul and the harmonizing purpose that all life shares in; there shall be a principle that might be known as ecology. The human life that sustains itself by using nature will not act to destroy nature so that it will be unable to sustain the future of all life to a high quality. To this end sovereign rights will be limited and new technology will be regulated. The polluting effect of converting nature to the needs of man will not be downloaded on other people or future generations thereof.

    4. Honesty and transparency of organizational behavior will be paramount. Secrecy and empire-building will be altered through citizen oversight and sunshine laws that seek to rationalize the most productive and fair application of goals and use of resources.

    5. Corrective action to remediate the existing inequities will be a short term necessity. Immigration, pollution, ethnic and religious prejudices including the 'War on Women' will have to be addressed.

    THE BROTHERHOOD OF MAN: PRINCIPLES AND PLANS FOR HARMONY!

    SPECIFIC PROJECTS:

    1) End all standing armies - forwarded by Albert Einstein, seconded by Mahatma Gandhi and Annie Besant

    Description - General:

    A phased in centralization of the present loose U.N. and NATO objectives for co-ordinated action will be easy to garner over 100 nations support. The small and often ill-equipped nations will love to have the protection but will they abide by the principles that must be agreed to and then implemented according to verifiable and transparent means. The long term objective of total disarmament of all nations and an International Police Force will require incentives and sanctions.

    Action Plan:
    i) The leaders of the G-7 nations will adopt the policy of the World Council on Peace and Love (Shalom), within two years of the formation of this austere group and their advisory councils or Elders.
    ii) Create a training academy for police people called the Bertrand Russell Peace Academy. It will report to the enforcement arm of the World Court in The Hague, which might retain the name but not the methods of Interpol.
    iii) Utilize cost savings in every country according to the principles and give first priority to the restitution of those disenfranchised through past practices (e.g. women and natives). A small percentage of cost savings will be allowed to go to reduce taxes if educational goals are properly funded.
    iv) G-7 countries will retain overall military budget including spy agency effort costs. These funds will be given to the International Police Agency that they will sit on the Board of Accountability of. Citizen oversight will include Amnesty International and other agents shown to be in concert with the principles. They may be encouraged; to amalgamate their efforts and costs. This funding from G-7 countries who will disband all personal activities that empower themselves or lead to industrial or other espionage, will continue until the Council determines a reduction is warranted.
    v) Upon the recommendation of Councilor the Police (and World Court) trade sanctions will be rigorously imposed. Incentives and technological exchanges will cease and those who break the laws will pay for any costs associated with their apprehension to the full extent of their ability to pay, and of any that were in concert with their acts.
    vi) Educational targeting of the population of said countries will be upgraded to include information on how their leaders are engaged in any nefarious acts against the good of their citizens.
    vii) Intervention by forceful means will start (if warranted) through the use of laser weapons in space targeted at the leaders and their resources. Computer and other Info Warfare will include seizing bank accounts and creating havoc among the rich and elite of said country. Exceptions to this rule will be made if these rich people have proven their continuing value and commitment to the PRINCIPLES in the eyes of Interpol or the World Court.



    2) Earth Ownership of Space Colonies - forwarded by John F. Kennedy and Francis Bacon

    Description - General:

    The existing space agency with twenty countries that is headquartered in Geneva will become the first Co-ordinated Government FOR all people on Earth. The assets and profits less liabilities will be owned by the citizens and inhabitants of Earth. The Alaskan oil revenues might provide an example for how this will be done. The Gene Roddenberry Institute will be created to examine the creation of Prime Directives and enabling laws for utopian organizational structure and government in space. The populous nations of the world will have to institute more humane and realistic controls on growth of the populace, but this will enable their citizens (like in Rome) to become major purchasers of goods, and consumers will abound for the corporate community. It will take a century before the cash reaches the hands of the average person from the date of re-organization. No hypothecation in advance of first receipts will be legal. Most people receiving gene-therapy will be living twice as long as presently, this will also lead to evaluating population and procreation rights issues. Some kind of entrepreneurial incentive plan without long term owning of land will be utilized. It might be a management results oriented idea such as corporate bonuses in major corporations, with public funding administered by educational organizations such as research institutes or think tanks that are now working. There will be a great deal of job creation on earth as the assets that are now expended in bombs and weapons that provide further reduction in assets (when they blow up their targets) are applied to efforts that increase and multiply with the creation of new resources and colonies.

    The Mars terraforming project that could be paid for out of existing NASA expenditures is estimated to cost $5 Billion a year for twenty years before man can walk on the surface without a space suit. It will take 150 years before the flora, fauna and atmosphere are quite like Earth.
    Contemplative Initiatives:
    i) Ethical issues must be fully contemplated before programs are ramped out. For example the von Neumann probes might upset the natural evolution of sentient beings on other planets as they take genetic material to these planets. My input (for what it is worth) is that we are entitled to do this on any planet that we have reason to believe has not developed a creature more complex than ocean life was before animals. Beyond that there may be other situations that we need to make sure the life on the planet isn't as soulful as it will be after we alter its whole evolution and creation process.
    ii) Funding of the space programs seems to be proceeding with a lot of magnanimous input from countries like the U.S.; and international ownership of the moon and even Antarctica show the necessary ethics are being proposed. However, I can imagine there might be corporate back room deals that we aren't aware of. It should be clearly projected and known by any who wish to inform themselves. What are the long term plans for space? Sale of bonds bearing interest might accelerate the program to colonize the third planet in the Alpha Centauri system. It will take 15 years to get there and a few years to build the space ships.

    I sent these things to Richard Branson just about a year before he created his Council of Elders including people I recommended.

    cont'd
    Last edited by R_Baird; 12-30-2015 at 02:06 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,785
    FORMATION OF THE WORLD COUNCIL ON PEACE AND LOVE (SHALOM):

    Proposed Founding Members and The Process of Selection:

    General: Jimmy Carter may be too old unless the telomeres are revitalizable to generate a reversal of the aging process soon. He would be a good person to assist in the selection and constitution of the people who would lead the first council and might remain as an advisory panel participant. Oprah Winfrey's 'Remembering Your Spirit' segment is in line with the educational approaches to ecumenicism and could be expanded on the world wide web and used as a model for people to continue their education in night classes and parenting for 'Positive Value Systems' such as the logotherapy approaches and co-operative learning being developed by such universities as the Wisconsin School of Psychology. She would be a good candidate for the first Council membership which would be only six in number. Six is a good decision making group and it would be comprised of three women and three men. An argument could be made for more women on the first Council. Oprah is well known and knows business and the media world that will be so important to the initial diplomatic and formative efforts of galvanizing public awareness and hope for a real change. Craig Ventner is the firebrand entrepreneurial scientist who made his mark in development of the human genome map. His scientific approach to making things happen rather than conventional 'reductivist' paradigms would empower the group to be more creative and proactive. There are others who would fill this bill, such as Ray Kurzweil or Fritjof Capra. The term of the initial Council might be ten years and expanded to more as the life prolonging technologies are in use. It would therefore be important for the team to enjoy each other and find the right mix of styles and approaches. Marianne Williamson is part of a group of 'New Age' philosophers and philanthropists who have a similar ideal to what is being proposed herein. It is new and has no politically oriented goals at present but these social salons of aware people are a great idea. This group includes Deepak Chopra and Dr. Wayne Dyer, who are both excellent candidates for the advisory panels. They are all eloquent spokespeople whose influence and audience will support this idea. Marianne has a nurturing diplomatic approach that might be right for this Council. Gloria Steinem is well known and politically aware. She might be willing to become involved as a personal assistant to an Islamic woman or the model leading the genital disfigurement action group. It is good to have as many ethnic backgrounds in this high profile position as possible in order to generate public enthusiasm and act as 'role models' for people throughout the world. A Chinese woman would also be necessary to be involved, though they (the leaders of the country) will be the hardest group to convince that free access to information will generate more for everybody. These leaders may be able to see the merit of near immortal physical life and nanotechnological advances that they won't be able to get if they aren't a part of 'The Brotherhood of Man'. In truth they are probably stealing or as aware of these technologies already and it may take a long time (perhaps until space is being able to produce results) for them to get on board. The use of information and even mind control devices to reach the people of China and get them to replace their leadership might be required. China has biological and other weapons to wipe out life on earth as of now! Thus this area of conflict would have to be approached with care. Bill Joy has shown courage and 'openness' as well as having the background in technology that would enhance this team so that they might not need so many experts to assist them in decision-making. I personally would not mind Bill Clinton being on this team, but I recognize he has some P.R. problems that would come with him. The legal and political savvy as well as the ability to reduce things to simple and communicative words is what he would bring to the enterprise. He might have a role as a panel chief on Re-Structuring the Law and authority of the World Court.

    REMUNERATION AND AUTHORITY OF THE COUNCIL':

    NONE!

    The auspices of this organization will be to influence public opinion and their expenses would be paid for by grants and donations. They will set an example of volunteerism that will motivate and duplicate throughout all strata of humanity. Their message and ideas will be taken directly to the people with full transparency. Their diplomatic clout with nations will be all the more immense as a result. With the initial efforts in the formative stages it will require vision and some behind the scenes planning. They will try to generate as much momentum and model programs as possible in order to sustain hope and not become another failed utopian event like the 'Gracchi' or the Oneida colony. They will encourage the awareness of great leaders of the past who shared these ideals, in all cultures whether it be Asoka or Akbar the Great. The U.S. was founded as an experiment of the age of Enlightenment by the Masons/ Rosicrucians. I believe they alone could make this initial momentum become real. There are foundations of a charitable nature such as the $17 Billion in Bill Gates' fund that would ensure credibility. Some of those involved with Marianne Williamson's social salons are well situated financially as well. Any politician who stood in the way of HOPE for all mankind might have a far shorter career than he/she had hoped for. A Further detail and illustration: EMPOWERMENT OF THE WORLD COURT -- Forwarded by Pierre Trudeau and the Dalai Lama



    Description - General: Concurrent with Interpol this organization will have expanded power over trade (G.A.T.T.) and the establishment of new laws to replace those which nations currently institute wherein double-standards and prejudices are maintained and fostered, as already contemplated in previous remarks. The false memory lie detection technology will be enabled and made use of to reduce incarceration of innocents and the costs associated with current jurisprudences and so-called justice systems. The Panel that will work on effective new approaches and models will be sensitive to the sociological upset that a new approach might cause and thus will use a phased-in gradual alteration of existing systems. A Brehon Law College will be created to re-train existing jurists and improve the use of technology. In France there is a long history of guilty until proven innocent for example. The different approaches and sociological realities must be considered rather than draconian insistence on immediate adherence. If and when all nations in the U.N. are adherents to the Principles or being phased-in to them - then and only then, the U.N. will be able to take a greater role as the Council and their advisory panels or the leaders of nations agree. The authority of the Council might be increased, if they agree, by the leaders of the nations. The World Court will be one of the key diplomatic initiatives of the Council as it begins to influence change. The threat of run-away technological dangers like airborne nanotechnologically enhanced pollen and biologics and the errors Bill Joy says might occur will scare a lot of people into seeing a need to expand the World Court's power. I think S.A.L.T. and other weapons such as the Non-lethal EMF or 'mind-control' devices might come under a special agency of this Court as well. Perhaps a referendum that each person of the adhering nations gets an equal vote in would be taken before empowering the aggressive implementation of the first sanctions or acts against non-adherents. Peaceful means such as informing the citizens over a period of years (World Wide Web, etc.) would be explored and given a chance, first. Even after the referendum there should be a period of delay before action is taken, this might be two years. The ability of the World Court to continue major offensive action will not require further referendums once they have started doing it. However, periodic re-assessments and citizen oversight might lead to periodic referendums. The thought being that Peace and Good Examples are better ethics than 'might is right'. If a sovereign nation protects a world class criminal Interpol might still be able to take targeted intrusive action. This would be something that the Council and its' oversight might be involved in.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •