Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The True Cause of Global Warming. Electro/Geomagnetic Reversal & Pole Shift.

  1. #1

    The True Cause of Global Warming. Electro/Geomagnetic Reversal & Pole Shift.

    This is a MUST READ!!! NASA scientists have revealed the truth to what is NOW happening to this world. Earth Warming & Increased Earthquake and Volcanic activity & much worse to come!! Read this, know the truth.

    http://www.facebook.com/notes/daniel...56107937814805

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    madrid
    Posts
    10
    Cut all the public funding of the Warmists and you will end Global Warming tomorrow.

    This scam has persisted for more than 30 years and it will never stop for as long as its proponents are well paid from the public trough to keep screeching about it.

    You want to stop the man-made Global Warming fraud? --- then cut off their public funding and start prosecuting the main proponents for their theft of taxpayer money.


    Web Designing Company in Delhi | Web Designing Companies in Delhi | India Tour

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Syracuse, New York
    Posts
    3
    The true cause of Global Warming is caused by the government installations called H.A.A.R.P. You can also Google the internet for more information. Basically, H.A.A.R.P. has a number of its installations around the world and what it does is send billions of watts of electricity into the ionosphere: electrical sphere that surrounds the planet and pushes the Earth's atmospheric enveloped out from forty to sixty miles. This is actually what has disrupted the weather patterns around the world for the last three decades. This is also what cause the crop circles to manifest in very intricate patterns around the world; whereas, before they were but splotches on the turf. Look up the history of crop circles.

    Normally when the ionosphere has too much electricity it releases that energy out into space or through lightning storms or balls of energy that descends into the oceans or onto the earth without harm. NOW because of H.A.A.R.P. there is a great deal of energy constantly being emitted into space or back on to earth: this is what I believe is causing Global Warming. It is my belief that the extended atmospheric sphere cannot NOW be reduced and if it is not maintained the government fears that the bubble will burst. SO IT HAS BECOME ONE BIG NEVER-ENDING VICIOUS CYCLE.

    The original purpose for H.A.A.R.P. was to make it easier to spy on any nation in the world: i.e. anybody in the world electronically and it was also to disrupt all electrical technology in any particular city in the world: i.e. Consider the infrastructure of Iraq after the American Forces took over. The technicians could not get the infrastructure back online because H.A.A.R.P. fried the circuitry of the computers that ran the whole infrastructure.
    Last edited by William Meegan; 12-20-2013 at 11:22 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    5
    Al Gore made it obvious that the government was privy to global weather changes 30 years ago, and he cashed in..
    My brother as a very young child , 40 years ago was also privy to pole shifting and impending future doom and gloom..Go figure eh?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1
    I appreciate the work of all people who share information with others. Great forum.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1
    This last Friday there was a show that aired on H2 after Ancient Aliens. It was called "The Devils Graveyards". It would behoove you all to do your best to see the show. It is so informative, it is just astounding how much these researchers have discovered.
    I can't believe there are still people around that do not believe in global warming. How stupid is that?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    1,569
    The Greenland Ice shows that earth has had more pollution than now at times like the start of the Iron Age. In any event the earth atmosphere and oceans can be harvested for metals and useful ingredients of pollution through nanotechnological methods now. But that isn't happening and the tundra is melting and will release far more greenhouse gases (methane) than the cars do. Estimates of water level increases will mean huge dykes will have to be built near Gibraltar and Suez. It would be cheaper to have self-replicating nanites at work - but soon!

    http://inhabitat.com/5-crazy-ways-to...-dam/?extend=1

    There are many causes of global and regional warming. The shifting currents in the oceans are part of the dynamic as we see in these tidbits.

    ICE AGES: - The impact of the ice ages and inter-glacial effects on the rise and fall of ocean levels and the earth readjustments to the departure of the ice cap cannot be over-looked in the human historical picture. Research in the area is far greater than in the recent past and we can learn what might have happened to earlier civilizations on earth. Atlantis is a given name for a civilization that inhabited many islands and coastal regions, in my mind. The idea of one central location makes little sense when one considers such things as Ice Ages and changes in the flow of the Gulf Stream and climate that resulted. Because it lasted for from 30,000 to 100,000 years and may have co-existed with other civilizations rising and falling it is most inauspicious to debate one specific time when it was in Tara or Crete or the Azores or Bimini or even Finias. That seems to be the usual debate among the over 25,000 books written about just this one lost civilization. As long as people don't integrate all facts they inevitably just come up with theories to fit pet or prevailing concepts. In Gateway to Atlantis, 'The Search for the source of a lost Civilization' we see a far better scholar who is doing the right kind of investigation. Mapping of the ocean bottoms and geological understandings as well as studying glacial deposits and tree rings gives a better picture of history than history books.

    "In 1960 a scientific paper by Wallace S. Broecker and his colleagues Maurice Ewing and Bruce C. Heezen, of Lamont Geological Observatory at Columbia University, Palisades, New York, appeared in the 'American Journal of Science'. Entitled 'Evidence for an Abrupt Change in Climate close to 11,000 years ago', it advanced the theory that a 'number of geographically isolated systems suggested that the warming of world-wide climate which occurred at the close of Wisconsin glacial times was extremely abrupt. (3)

    By examining sediment cores taken from various deep-sea locations, Broecker and his team were able to demonstrate that around c. 9000 BC. the surface water temperature of the Atlantic Ocean increased by between six and ten degrees centigrade, (4) enough to alter its entire ecosystem. More significantly, it was found that the bottom waters of the Cariaco Trench in the Caribbean Sea, off Venezuela, suddenly stagnated, {The Gulf Stream being sent back south from hitting the land around the Azores when the water level was lower suddenly started warming the Iceland and British Isles regions, again.} showing that an abrupt change in water circulation had taken place coincident to the warming of the oceans. (5) Additionally, the silt deposits washing into the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi Valley abruptly halted and were retained in the delta and valleys, as the waters from the glacier-bound Great Lakes switched direction and began draining through the previously frozen northern outlets. (6) With extreme rapidity, the water levels of these lakes shrank from maximum volume, down to the much lower level they occupy today. (7)



    Among the data drawn on by Broecker and his team to make their findings was the work conducted in 1957 by Cesare Emiliani of the Department of Geology at the University of Miami. He found that deep-sea cores displayed clear evidence of an abrupt temperature turn around in 9000 BC. was responsible for the other changes set out by Broecker et al. (8) However, since other cores examined by Emiliani had not shown the same rapid transition, he decided that the anomalous cores lacked vital sediment layers covering a period of several thousand years of ecological history, and so dismissed them as unreliable. (9) Yet Broecker and his colleagues disputed Emiliani's interpretation of the results. They could find no reason to suppose that key sediment layers could have been lost in the manner suggested. As a consequence, they reinstated Emiliani's controversial findings as crucial evidence of a major shift in oceanic temperatures around 11,000 years ago. (10)

    Although Broecker et al seemed keen to promote a date of c. 9000 BC for the rapid transition from glacial to post-glacial ages, there are indications that this event did not occur until a slightly later period. At least three lake sites in the Great Basin region revealed carbon-14 dates around 8000 BC for a maximum water level shortly 'before' they experienced a sudden desiccation after the withdrawal of the ice sheets. (11) In addition to this, marine shells from the St. Lawrence Valley, which provided evidence of an invasion of seawater coincident to a rapid ice retreat, frequently produced dates 'post' 9000 BC. (12)

    Broecker and his colleagues accepted the presence of these much lower dates and suggested that the whole matter was complicated by the fact that there had been an estimated 200-year resurgence of glacial conditions, known as the Valders re-advance, around the mid-ninth millennium BC. They therefore acknowledged that their own findings might in fact relate to the recession of the ice fields after this time, bringing the dates of their suggested 'major fluctuation in climate' and the 'sharp change in oceanic conditions' down to well below c. 9000 BC. (13)

    THE EVIDENCE OF POLLEN SPECTRA

    Further evidence that dramatic changes accompanied the transition from glacial to post-glacial ages came from the work of Herbert E. Wright Jnr, of the School of Earth Sciences at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, (14) and J Gordon Ogden III of the Department of Botany and Bacteriology at the Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware. (15) Both examined the pollen spectra range from sediment cores taken from various lake sites in the Great Lakes area and found they provided clear evidence of an abrupt shift in flora at the end of glaciation. The spruce forests that had thrived in the cold harsh climate for many thousands of years were supplanted swiftly, first by pine and then by mixed hardwood forests, such as birch and oak. Deciduous trees, as we know, only thrive in a warmer climate.

    The significance of these findings is the acceleration at which this transition took place. In an article for the journal 'Quaternary Paleoecology' in 1967, Ogden pointed out that some pollen spectra samples showed a 50 per cent replacement from spruce to pine occurring in just 10 centimetres of sediment. (16) In one sample taken from a site named Glacial Lake Aitken in Minnesota, the transition from 55 per cent to 18 per cent spruce pollen occurred in only 7.6 centimetres of sediment, re- presenting a deposition corresponding to just 170 years. (17) The problem here is that conventional geologists and paleoecologists consider that the transition from glacial to post-glacial ages occurred over several 'thousand' years, not just a few hundred {The time it takes for one or two trees to live and die.} years.



    These findings so baffled Ogden that he was led to comment: 'The only mechanism sufficient to produce a change of the kind described here would therefore appear to be a rapid and dramatic change in temperature and/or precipitation approximately 10,000 years ago.' (18)

    What kind of climatic 'event' might have been responsible for this 'rapid and dramatic change in temperature' {Could this relate to the buttercups found frozen and undigested in Mammoth mouths of the Arctic?} in the American Midwest, sometime around c. 8000 BC? Had it been a consequence of the proposed cometary impact that devastated the western hemisphere during this same epoch?

    The knowledge that some 65 million years ago the Cretaceous period had been abruptly brought to a close by just such an impact has softened the most stubborn of minds concerning such a possibility. Broecker himself, in an article written for 'Scientific American' in 1983, now accepted that asteroid or comet impacts might be responsible for the instigation and termination of glacial ages. (19)

    This is indeed what Emilio Spedicato has suggested as the mechanism behind the revolution in climate and ocean temperature experienced during this period..." (20)

    We will return to implications related to this and the work of Mr. Collins throughout this encyclopedia as we develop real history from actual facts rather than the Bible Narrative. It should be evident that these climate changes had significant impacts on society and created a loss of culture and technology in certain areas of the world. There were probably people who took advantage of these spiritual and other perceptions that resulted as well.
    Last edited by R_Baird; 04-16-2015 at 09:26 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •