Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: The Aquarian Conspiracy

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786

    The Aquarian Conspiracy

    Toynbee's history was a cover-up and if he knew who was in control in Egypt or Rome he did not write it in his books. That does not mean his involvement with British Intelligence is not important. The use of media including the books and movies which resulted from those author's efforts is substantial in determining our present society. Is it better because Orwell was right about 1984 or Aldous was prophetic? Is this really a lot like the drugged up Oracles in Greece getting payola for promoting a new venture in a new colony? The Aquarian Conspiracy itself was forwarded by a top futurist named Naisbitt in one of its later editions.

    The degree of manipulation you know about is directly related to the amount of what you think about. Thinking is not a skill you learn in school and presumably your parents were too busy to teach you even if they knew what was going on - which would make them very unusual.

    There is no black and white boogeyman but both sides of every issue are managed and considered with resultant contingencies generated when necessary. The politicians are not all that capable of deciding what is needed and they listen to the bureaucrats who are supported and trained by think tanks or outgrowths of the Rhodes Round Tables and banker's monies. So WHAT?

    Some people think it is bad to make plans for the future and hope their g-d will bring them Rapture - which is a racist ideology as you should know. Others including Ted Turner actually say what they want - and that is refreshing but scary too.

    We must evaluate the extent of lies from all quarters if we are to evaluate the Huxley's. Obviously by the very fact that they were related to THE Huxley in the Huxley-Wilberforce debates which put Christianity on the defensive to an extent it had to drop the creationist argument in most places and even consider the Pope might not be infallible and other lesser adaptations it waffles about such as Vatican II.

    I can assure you Stanford Research Institute is totally into mind control of any and all kinds. I have raised concerns about Esalen having this kind of involvement in social engineering. Aldous and others at Esalen provided what I consider to be a leading edge breeding ground for the ecumenical wisdom all religions must eventually get behind or life on Earth is in grave danger of an Armageddon type event that many lifeforms will not recover from.

    That does not mean I like Tavistock's involvement in the World Health Organization founding and support for drug pushing psychiatrists who do not study chemistry enough to know the damage done - especially when used in concert with any other form of natural and unnatural chemicals. I can tell you much of what you will read in the link that follows is true. That does not mean I agree with any of it's conclusions or fear-mongering. The Church of Scientology through Crowley and Jack Parsons is part of what happened, The kids who shot up the movie theatre in Colorado a few years ago were the children of a SRI mind control scientists who might even have used his own as guinea pigs (Not as bad as what B. F. Skinner did probably). The occult has lots of uses inside Churches other than Scientology as I have proven in many places so waving that flag around as if some devil is at work does not make any sense for me.

    "The high priest for Britain's Opium War was Aldous Huxley, the grandson of Thomas H. Huxley, a founder of the Rhodes Roundtable group and a lifelong collaborator of Arnold Toynbee. Toynbee himself sat on the RIIA council for nearly fifty years, headed the Research Division of British intelligence throughout World War II, and served as wartime briefing officer of Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Toynbee's "theory" of history, expounded in his twenty-volume History of Western civilization, was that its determining culture has always been the rise and decline of grand imperial dynasties. At the very point that these dynasties—the "thousand year Reich" of the Egyptian pharaohs, the Roman Empire, and the British Empire—succeed in imposing their rule over the entire face of the earth, they tend to decline. Toynbee argued that this decline could be abated if the ruling oligarchy (like that of the British Roundtable) would devote itself to the recruitment and training of an ever-expanding priesthood dedicated to the principles of imperial rule.3

    Trained at Toynbee's Oxford, Aldous Huxley was one of the initiates in the "Children of the Sun," a Dionysian cult comprised of the children of Britain's Roundtable elite.4 Among the other initiates were T.S. Eliot, W.H. Auden, Sir Oswald Mosley, and D.H. Lawrence, Huxley's homosexual lover. It was Huxley, furthermore, who would launch the legal battle in the 1950s to have Lawrence's pornographic novel Lady Chatterley's Lover allowed into the United States on the ground that it was a misunderstood "work of art."5

    Aldous Huxley, along with his brother Julian, was tutored at Oxford by H.G. Wells, the head of British foreign intelligence during World War I and the spiritual grandfather of the Aquarian Conspiracy. Ferguson accurately sees the counterculture as the realization of what Wells called The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution. The "Open Conspiracy," Wells wrote, "will appear first, I believe, as a conscious organization of intelligent and quite possibly in some cases, wealthy men, as a movement having distinct social and political aims, confessedly ignoring most of the existing apparatus of political control, or using it only as an incidental implement in the stages, a mere movement of a number of people in a certain direction who will presently discover with a sort of surprise the common object toward which they are all moving . . . In all sorts of ways they will be influencing and controlling the apparatus of the ostensible government." 6

    What Ferguson left out is that Wells called his conspiracy a "one-world brain" which would function as "a police of the mind." Such books as the Open Conspiracy were for the priesthood itself. But Wells's popular writings (Time Machine, The Island of Dr. Moreau, and so forth), and those of his proteges Aldous Huxley (Brave New World) and George Orwell (1984 and Animal Farm), were written as "mass appeal" organizing documents on behalf of one-world order. Only in the United States are these "science fiction classics" taught in grade school as attacks against fascism.

    Under Wells's tutelage, Huxley was first introduced to Aleister Crowley. Crowley was a product of the cultist circle that developed in Britain from the 1860s under the guiding influence of Edward Bulwer-Lytton—who, it will be recalled, was the colonial minister under Lord Palmerston during the Second Opium War. In 1886, Crowley, William Butler Yeats, and several other Bulwer-Lytton proteges formed the Isis-Urania Temple of Hermetic Students of the Golden Dawn. This Isis Cult was organized around the 1877 manuscript Isis Unveiled by Madame Helena Blavatsky, in which the Russian occultist called for the British aristocracy to organize itself into an Isis priesthood.7

    The subversive Isis Urania Order of the Golden Dawn is today an international drug ring said to be controlled by the Canadian multi-millionaire, Maurice Strong, who is also a top operative for British Intelligence.

    In 1937, Huxley was sent to the United States, where he remained throughout the period of World War II. Through a Los Angeles contact, Jacob Zeitlin, Huxley and pederast Christopher Isherwood were employed as script writers for MGM, Warner Brothers, and Walt Disney Studios. Hollywood was already dominated by organized crime elements bankrolled and controlled through London. Joseph Kennedy was the frontman {Kennedy was no simple front. He was worse!} for a British consortium that created RKO studios, and "Bugsy" Siegel, the West Coast boss of the Lansky syndicate, was heavily involved in Warner Brothers and MGM. {Scientology moved in when others moved out.}

    Huxley founded a nest of Isis cults in southern California and in San Francisco, that consisted exclusively of several hundred deranged worshipers of Isis and other cult gods. Isherwood, during the California period, translated and propagated a number of ancient Zen Buddhist documents, inspiring Zen-mystical cults along the way.8

    In effect, Huxley and Isherwood (joined soon afterwards by Thomas Mann and his daughter Elisabeth Mann Borghese) laid the foundations during the late 1930s and the 1940s for the later LSD culture, by recruiting a core of "initiates" into the Isis cults that Huxley's mentors, Bulwer-Lytton, Blavatsky, and Crowley, had constituted while stationed in India."


    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/aquarian.htm

    Bulwer-Lytton was instrumental in the Thule Society which heralded Hitler as the new Messiah after taking part in training him and his father before him. There has always been a push and pull Dialectic - no New World Order. I have identified smaller groups of more advanced people who train the best operatives like Thomas Paine, St. Germain, Jean Lafitte and Thomas Jefferson.

    "Man achieves the height of Wisdom when all that he does is as self evident as what Nature does." - I Ching

    Here is a pdf for Naisbitt's Megatrends.
    https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/...pdf?sequence=5
    Last edited by R_Baird; 03-17-2016 at 07:50 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786
    When you get to the point where some point of view seems to include consideration of something a little different than a rant about the demon rum or the devil behind the CIA and every branch of government including the Brits, you will know you are witnessing a rare moment in human growth and enlightenment. David Icke has made fortunes selling Queen Mum reptoid crap. Look under any alien theory far enough and you will find Bible-Thumpers or the likes of Bibliotecca (Library) pleiades (Is that where Xenu lives or is it Hubbard?). Yes, there are moles and assholes and Holier than Holies all around. The Bible sells the same alien drug today that it did a millennium before Christianity and Smyrna Turkish tobacco (opium) run by Onassis who partnered with Joe Kennedy in oil scheming has a family history of many more millennia doing this same stuff.

    There are so many over-statements and misleading statements in what I am quoting but you will hopefully get the truth of that on your own. I had associates with people who knew Ram Dass and Leary, as I have covered (Dottie). I know LSD is still the best drug for treating alcoholism and illegal usages of a drug called Antabuse gets insiders in the government calling the drug clinics who use it when the inspectors are going to visit. Those insiders are government people - breaking the law. I think fundamentalist Christian thinking allowed Hoover to play King maker and MLK killer. He abused the Nation for five decades. They still go against the wishes of the electorate on Marijuana and operate stings and worse - see CI Pyramid. The Penal colony (see my 'twin') is corrupt and dangerous, and creates drug use galore - not done by the counter-culture I assure you. I really should trust you to do your own thinking and research on this.

    " Back in California, Gregory Bateson had maintained the Huxley operation out of the Palo Alto VA hospital. Through "SD experimentation on patients already hospitalized for psychological problems, Bateson established a core of "initiates" into the "psychedelic" Isis Cult.

    Foremost among his Palo Alto recruits was Ken Kesey. In 1959, Bateson administered the first dose of "SD to Kesey. By 1962, Kesey had completed a novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which popularized the notion that society is a prison and the only truly "free" people are the insane.15

    Kesey subsequently organized a circle of "SD initiates called "The Merry Pranksters." They toured the country disseminating SD" (often without forewarning the receiving parties), building up local distribution connections, and establishing the pretext for a high volume of publicity on behalf of the still minuscule "counterculture."

    By 1967, the Kesey cult had handed out such quantities of "SD that a sizable drug population had emerged, centered in the Haight-Ashbury district of San Francisco. Here Huxley collaborator Bateson set up a "free clinic," staffed by **Dr. David Smith—later a "medical adviser" for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML); **Dr. Ernest Dernberg an active-duty military officer, probably on assignment through MK-UItra; **Roger Smith—a street gang organizer trained by Saul Alinsky. During the Free Clinic period, Roger Smith was the parole officer of the cultist mass murderer Charles Manson; **Dr. Peter Bourne—formerly President Carter's special assistant on drug abuse, Bourne did his psychiatric residency at the Clinic. He had previously conducted a profiling study of GI heroin addicts in Vietnam.

    The Free Clinic paralleled a project at the Tavistock Institute, the psychological warfare agency for the British Secret Intelligence Service. Tavistock, founded as a clinic in London in the 1920s, had become the Psychiatric Division of the British Army during World War II under its director, Dr. John Rawlings Rees.16

    During the 1960s, the Tavistock Clinic fostered the notion that no criteria for sanity exist and that psychedelic "mind-expanding" drugs are valuable tools of psychoanalysis. In 1967, Tavistock sponsored a Conference on the "Dialectics of Liberation," chaired by Tavistock psychoanalyst Dr. R.D. Laing, himself a popularized author and advocate of drug use. That conference drew a number of people who would soon play a prominent role in fostering terrorism; Angela Davis and Stokely Carmichael were two prominent American delegates.

    Thus, by 1963, Huxley had recruited his core of "initiates." All of them—Leary, Osmund, Watts, Kesey, Alpert—became the highly publicized promoters of the early LSD counterculture. By 1967, with the cult of "Flower People" in Haight-Ashbury and the emergence of the antiwar movement, the United States was ready for the inundation of LSD, hashish and marijuana that hit American college campuses in the late 1960s."


    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/aquarian.htm
    Last edited by R_Baird; 03-12-2016 at 01:52 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786
    In my Pentecostal Deliverance thread from many months ago I addressed the vaunted Brother Branham these cultists are touting. I just added a little mention of this discourse on that thread but here is some of what I say on that thread.

    The psychological or growing up issues demonstrated by this man are a common cause of people joining cults. Should we teach people enough about these things (comparative religious history) to improve the life of so many people who get hoodwinked by religion? Usually there is a modicum of knowledge which these cults build upon, and that can be gleaned to improve the life of a person interested in further research. The extent of idiocy in the work of these people who follow Brother Branham mentioned below is amazing even to me. I am addressing the whole of this chapter from a book on the following link - http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/aquarian.htm

    "My connection to this controversial "cult" (as it has been labelled) goes back to the late sixties. I was one of the "absurd" generation of the sixties, a "hippie" -- dark-haired and gloomy complected, unsure-of-myself, searching for meaning to my life, a cause to live for, and help for my own tumults and urges. Brother B. (Bishop Whitlock) was already an outcast among many of the churches of Fresno, regarded as a bit suspect, a bit too pentecostal or shamanistic. Before he founded Trinity Institute, he had been Chaplain at what was then "Fresno General Hospital," working with an old time Presbyterian Calvinist named Russell Knight.

    The rumors of outsiders about Bishop Whitlock (or Brother B. as we called him) were of several general types. One was that he strayed too far from orthodoxy in bringing to life a gnostic or "Alexandrian" cultishness. One complaint was that his teaching was too "soulish"; another that his intercessory (shepherding) style was too "Freudian." Some churches forgave his exuberant "holy roller" background, but were horrified by rumors that he was Pelagian, and preached a form of works, rather than Reformation-style "salvation by faith alone." (Which actually goes back to Saints Augustine and Paul, though perhaps not to Jesus himself.)

    Well, (like Monica the mother of Augustine) my mother had been prayin' mightily for her errant son (me), and she had come into the orbit of Bishop Whitlock. She did not regard him as occultish, or gnostic, or antinominian. In fact, she found his teaching to be fundamentally sound and scriptural. As I became more desperate, I finally cried out for myself, then asked my mother to pray for me, too. I also reached out to Russell Knight, the co-chaplain.

    Meanwhile, half the continent away, an evangelist by the name of Clarence Shannon was ministering in Springfield Missouri at the home of one William Branham. See Clarence Shannon. Brother Branham, a mighty man of God in his own right, referred Clarence to a Fresno chaplain by the name of Bishop Whitlock. Through a series of circumstances, the entire Shannon clan wound up living in the Ferger Street house of Bishop Whitlock. The Shannons' daughter Linda became my wife.



    Laying the axe to the root: Whitlock's teaching
    Far from teaching a gnostic or sexual gospel, Brother B. merely taught that true Christianity is a straight and narrow path, and few there be that find it. He taught that you have to humble yourself, lower yourself, allow the Father to discipline you, and cleanse you. He taught deliverance, and purgation, and the prayer closet. I know of nothing he ever taught that was contrary to the fundamental core of Christian faith, at least the first five or six councils of the early Church, even up to the formulation of the Trinity doctrine.

    Nevertheless, the church is in need of continuous reformation. If salvation got you in the door, the real work for us is an ongoing work of sanctification. White churchianity is oh-so-good at cleaning the outside of the pot, focussing on appearances. But the real need is to clean the inside of the pot. (See, Jesus washed dishes.)

    Sola scriptura is a fine reformation doctrine. (But only a start.) Truth be told, rigid doctrine is not what we need. You got to roll up your sleeves for the real work. What we need is inner cleansing, depth cleansing, a deeper work. Theology's dead letter killeth. What is needed is a return to the Spirit, to the basics of our faith. The word must live! White christianity looks down on native wisdom for its heathenism and its stress on the body. As if there is something subversive or mystical about "the Spirit" -- the Holy Ghost. Yet does not the Bible point us to the body, to the life of the Spirit? Look at Genesis. Look at the words of Jesus.

    Native spirituality teaches that wisdom must be lived. That means this world, and it means this body. White "civilization" looks down on the influence of native and African spirituality as if it is contaminated by earthy (read sexual?) influence. Supposedly the eagerness for the miraculous is suspect, too superstitious due to its craving for the supernatural. There must be something barbarian in the exuberant or existential and non-intellectual stirrings of these people of the earth. But is the smugness justified? The fact is, Jesus taught that it is not hearing his words, or concocting dogma, or constructing some elaborate religious edifice, is the way to salvation. Rather, it is DOING his words. That means, dare we say it, the body. The word made flesh. It's something to think about.



    Disallowed indeed of men
    It is true that Brother B. practiced laying on of hands. It is true that he sought to go deeper, to delve into the roots, the underlying causes behind the cries of the sin-sick who came seeking help. Only in that sense might we brand him, A Pagan suckled in a creed outworn. Yes, there was a focus on the body, not dogma and form. Thus the accusation of holistic believism. Of seeing "God" as both male and female. (And of seeing us humans as composed of both male and female.)

    Whitlock's independence and integrity meant too much to him to sacrifice on the false altar of conformism and "to-be-seen-of-men." He was an enemy of the smugness of conventional "churchianity." He seemed at odds with the complacency and self-satisfaction of the respectable churches. Even among the socalled "full gospel" movement, Brother B. preferred the lowliness of the blunt self-designation "Pentecostal" to the niceness of "charismatic." He hated the pretension of those preachers who strained so hard to win the acceptance of man, that they forgot the reward that comes from God only. Is not much of the disdain which the "proper" folk, the pious and respectable folk have for "pentecostal" type manifestations, at heart simply a matter of prejudice?

    I think there was something in Brother B. that recoiled from the priggishness and prudery of the hypocrites. The work of the prayer closet is blunt exposure, and opposing false modesty and self-delusion. The Deliverance Pentecostalism of Brother B. surely has much in common with the exorcist healings of older churches and bygone times, but beyond merely laying on of hands, Brother B. taught inner cleansing and purification. He urged us onward. We must "go on to perfection.""

    http://robtshepherd.tripod.com/whitlock.html

    "When to the garden of untroubled thought
    I came of late, and saw the open door,
    And wished again to enter, and explore
    The sweet, wild ways with stainless bloom inwrought,
    And bowers of innocence with beauty fraught,
    It seemed some purer voice must speak before
    I dared to tread that garden loved of yore,
    That Eden lost unknown and found unsought.

    Then just within the gate I saw a child, --
    A stranger-child, yet to my heart most dear;
    He held his hands to me, and softly smiled
    With eyes that knew no shade of sin or fear:
    "Come in," he said, "and play awhile with me;"
    "I am the little child you used to be."


    Henry Van Dyk"
    Last edited by R_Baird; 04-03-2016 at 12:56 AM. Reason: add content

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786
    Since they provided some leading questions at the end of their garbage which weaves some facts into a system of BELIEF which threatens to bring Armageddon to all life on Earth, I should answer those questions.

    When people will believe there is no end in what they will accept. I have nothing against the laying on of hands healers who tap into the power of Belief each person has in conjunction with the etheric energy. It can help - but it is not the work of a God or a prophet. Edgar Cayce should be called The Sleeping Profit but at least he woke up from his fundamentalist marketing plan (He and his father were high Masons) and went with the Eastern disciplines promoted by the people named as 'evil' by this web site and the article this excerpt is taken from.

    "So much of what 'man' has thought and done has, as we have just read, been folly. However, God, Whom these 'intellectuals' have left out of the equation, promised us a prophet and a way to escape the destruction being wrought by such carnal men (Malachi 4:5-6; Revelation 10:7). That prophet was William Branham (1909-1965). His ministry is reported on Bible Believer's web Site.


    DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

    1. Were Orwell and Huxley preparing us or warning us as Fabians?

    2. Are the British Royals something we now admire in America?

    3. Were drugs intentionally introduced to the U.S. at a time the British gave us no help in Vietnam?

    4. Can we criticize the British royals for being into the cult of Isis after looking at the top of our nation's capitol?

    5. Name a good recent book exposing British Fabianism.

    6. Why is Gorby here when he can't get 2% of the vote in Russia?

    7. President Bush and Paul McCartney were both knighted by the Queen. Why?

    8. Who presently is a member of the Knights of the Garter?


    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/aquarian.htm

    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/

    Answers:

    1. They were warning humanity and telling truth in a fictional form. They have been shown correct. The question about Fabians is a pejorative assuming a connection to a theory the person devising the question hopes you will accept has relevance. But they ask another question later and I will address it there.

    2. Some people do - and the British Royals have been a bad act but they have been reeled in and are pretty much just mouthpieces unless you want to rehash the past. I would like to dispossess them for many past acts. Raising them as a boogeyman for what ails our world is wrong and foolish.

    3. The US was involved in more than the British were. His history is biased, incomplete and leading. The US captured Japanese research at or near the end of WWII that along with their German scientists taken to Randolph AFB including Strughold/Green saw a ramping up of drug research into things such as you see in The Manchurian Candidate (Shrub on Jupiter Island and Averill Harriman who backed Hitler and was found guilty in US courts). Also look into Jacob's Ladder here. Drugs as a means of war and propaganda have been around for at least ten millennia - see Richard Rudgley. A similar fiction is told about the Russians having a lead in Psychic warfare potential which was proven wrong.

    4. No. You do not understand what is going on if you do. The Luciferian nonsense is similar. Osiris was a sun god but was likely a real person who was the equal of his lady named Isis. Son of man became sun of god and other flip back or reversals. See Heliopolitanism thread and many related threads like Rosicrucianism.

    5. There is not such a book. There are books this site and it's cult want you to read. A similar abuse of the good work of Mullins on the Fed was recently done by Scientology.

    6. Gorbachev went along with the plan to make Russia a new form of tyranny. They do not know what it was and they do not understand why it was done. Russia was a mirror of the US system and hired a bad man to head it up - Stalin. Government for the few by the few goes by many names - Synarchy and Oligarchy. The US is not a democracy, it is at best representational democracy but it is a republic.

    7. It is a popularity contest.

    8. Many good people who try to make plans to improve the way this world is governed. They are thwarted by ignorance and ignocenti who say they are reptoids or shape-shifting devils.

    I have dissected the "brothers" and biblebelievers website on many threads. I should allow some other inputs so you can see how Psyops or 'projection' works in our world these cretins abuse.

    "This report exposes agent-provocateurs who forge documents, edit Wikipedia biographies, revise histories to libel and discredit targeted opponents, and conspire to commit murder, including those of journalist/whistle-blowers, benefiting their CIA/FBI corporate handlers. This article documents how propaganda is administered today by COINTELPRO agents using the Internet, Wikipedia, and a "mix-it-all-up" strategy (i.e., the "Hegelian dialectic"). The agents co-create their celebrity, instigate and justify terrorism by generating religious and racial conflicts, cross-promote their divisive beliefs to generate controversies and social unrest, and divert attention from their criminal actions by projecting, through the media, their malice upon their targets.

    To effectively extend counter-intelligence and their PSYOPs (i.e., psychological operations), frightening truths are mixed with lies by these agent-provocateurs to undermine social and political activism. ...

    The Wiki-entities that claim to allow users to add and update biographies, routinely prohibit COINTELPRO victims from making corrections to their bios plagued by disinformation posted by CIA/FBI "dark editors," identified below as agent provocateurs.

    Numerous victims prove Wikipedia and the Wiki Company routinely violates their "neutral point of view" policy, and their "non-profit" public service commission, by facilitating this CIA/FBI fraud to further operations exclusively benefiting "crisis capitalists," and/or satanists.

    The CIA/FBI-linked "dark editors," identified below, are herein exposed destroying biographies of celebrities, scientists, inventors, whistleblowers, journalists, activists and dissidents of mainstream politics and social movements. In this way, this COINTELPRO works to degenerate society, stifling innovation and progress in every field. ....

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JsgSuERulw]


    The co-author of this report, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the Editor-in-Chief of Medical Veritas journal, .. was targeted by the agents exposed below. While being attacked himself, he received several requests from medical experts, scientists, and "BigPharma" whistleblowers to investigate a perceived criminal Wiki-COINTELPRO operation. Leaders from several organizations including the International Society of Orthomolecular Medicine (ISOM), and the World Organization for Natural Medicine (WONM), additionally complained. The ISOM issued an international alert (May 11, 2010; Orthomolecular Medicine News Service) informing members about the Wiki Foundation's fraud. The WONM, allied with the Sovereign Orthodox Order of Knights Hospitaller of St. John of Jerusalem, recorded the Wikipedia subversion of their humanitarian organizations, falsely tied by Wiki's "dark editors" to the Vatican, Jesuits, Jews/Zionists, and Knights of Malta, all demonized by the COINTELPRO agents.

    Wikipedia's Use for Social Engineering

    Evidence for psycho-social engineering through Wikipedia's yellow press is found in many places.

    Common sense suggests fraud. Since when is a whole field "unscientific," since science is applied to every field? Nutrition, for example, is a vital part of alternative medicine. When did the entire field of nutrition become unscientific? More importantly, who is served by this disinformation nonsense?

    Shedding light on the "dark editors" that Wikipedia encourages to violate common sense and experts' biographies on behalf of CIA/FBI corporate commissioners was difficult until recently. Proof of criminal operations surfaced involving CIA/FBI agent-provocateurs attempting to discredit Horowitz. These covert operators include Greg Szymanski and Eric Jon Phelps--journalists allied with Timothy Patrick White, "Dr. True Ott," Doug Millar, Xena Carpenter, and a few others. This group was found consistently communicating their advocacy for the famous FBI/CIA operative Ted Gunderson, who is among the nation's leading experts on pedophilia, satanic networks, and child-trafficking.

    The group of men are widely known as "brothers" in a religious cult called the "Bible Believers" that cross-promotes these agents, their theology, and activities. The "brothers" advance teachings of William Branham, memorialized by occult symbols on his "Christian" grave; and the Church of Satan leaders Anton LaVey and Michael Aquino. E-mails from Millar, White, and "True Ott" linked these men to numerous Internet articles featuring Gunderson's involvement in child-trafficking investigations, including allegations of his own involvements in this, the Church of Satan, and pedophilia.

    Wiki's lengthy list of persons targeted for character assassinations, including several celebrities, is labeled by the Phelps/Szymanski/CIA ring as "Masonic media agents." Altered biographies in Wikipedia libel and discredit these targets as "Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors," or "disinfo/distraction agents." Phelps and Szymanski's references tie them to a white racist anti-zionist satanic cult promoted by the "Bible Believers," their doctrines, and a leading PSYOPs expert, Michael A. Aquino."

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bl.../2581360/posts
    Last edited by R_Baird; 03-12-2016 at 03:35 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786
    The thread titled The Celestial Kingdom addresses some of the truth about the Opium Wars. It is important to know - and is still the cause of wars you are supporting. This is one post from it. You might also look into trepanning and the Obscene Ritual mentions on this website.

    From the NYTimes, we have a relative of an on-going story which involved a more recent Bush/Russell as drug runner or enabler; in both Vietnam and Afghanistan. Yes, I am afraid you are most likely only now becoming aware of the enormity of how true it is that "History Repeats". Cucumbers sometimes 'repeat' too and you should vomit when you learn about the Opium Wars and Daddy Bush being someone who fought against drugs (remember Iran/Contra for one).

    "The Opium War's Secret History

    By KARL E. MEYER

    Published: June 28, 1997


    Losers rarely name wars, an exception being the conflict between Britain and China from 1839 to 1842, known bluntly ever since as the Opium War. To most Chinese, a century of humiliation began with this war, in which Westerners sought to force a deadly drug on an Asian people, and then imposed an unequal treaty that pried open their country and annexed the island that became Hong Kong.

    In embarrassing truth, that is essentially what happened. As Hong Kong reverts to China at month's end, many of us for the first time may see a bit of history from a different end of the telescope. Yet a further point needs making. Even the authors of the Opium War were ashamed of it, and Western protests against it marked the beginning of a concern with international human rights that in a fresh turn embarrasses today's leaders in Beijing.

    Along with the slave trade, the traffic in opium was the dirty underside of an evolving global trading economy. In America as in Europe, pretty much everything was deemed fair in the pursuit of profits. Such was the outlook at Russell & Company, a Boston concern whose clipper ships made it the leader in the lucrative American trade in Chinese tea and silk.

    In 1823 a 24-year-old Yankee, Warren Delano, sailed to Canton, where he did so well that within seven years he was a senior partner in Russell & Company. Delano's problem, as with all traders, European and American, was that China had much to sell but declined to buy. The Manchu emperors believed that the Middle Kingdom already possessed everything worth having, and hence needed no barbarian manufactures.

    The British struck upon an ingenious way to reduce a huge trade deficit. Their merchants bribed Chinese officials to allow entry of chests of opium from British-ruled India, though its importation had long been banned by imperial decree. Imports soared, and nearly every American company followed suit, acquiring ''black dirt'' in Turkey or as agents for Indian producers.

    Writing home, Delano said he could not pretend to justify the opium trade on moral grounds, ''but as a merchant I insist it has been . . . fair, honorable and legitimate,'' and no more objectionable than the importation of wines and spirits to the U.S. Yet as addiction became epidemic, and as the Chinese began paying with precious silver for the drug, their Emperor finally in 1839 named an Imperial Commissioner to end the trade.

    Commissioner Lin Tse-hsu proceeded to Canton, seized vast stocks of opium and dumped the chests in the sea. This, plus a melee in which drunken sailors killed a Chinese villager, furnished the spark for the Opium War, initiated by Lord Palmerston, the British Prime Minister, and waged with determination to obtain full compensation for the opium. The Celestial Empire was humbled, forced to open five ports to foreign traders and to permit a British colony at Hong Kong.

    But as noteworthy, the war was denounced in Parliament as ''unjust and iniquitous'' by 30-year-old William Ewart Gladstone, who accused Palmerston of hoisting the British flag ''to protect an infamous contraband traffic.'' The same outrage was expressed in the pulpit and the press, in America and England, thereby encouraging Russell & Company and most other American businesses to pull out of the opium trade.

    Warren Delano returned to America rich, and in 1851 settled in Newburgh, N.Y. There he eventually gave his daughter Sara in marriage to a well-born neighbor, James Roosevelt, the father of Franklin Roosevelt. The old China trader was close-mouthed about opium, as were his partners in Russell & Company. It is not clear how much F.D.R. knew about this source of his grandfather's wealth. But the President's recent biographer Geoffrey Ward rejects efforts by the Delano family to minimize Warren's involvement.

    The family's discomfort is understandable. We no longer believe that anything goes in the global marketplace, regardless of social consequences. It is precisely this conviction that underlies efforts to attach human rights conditions to trading relations -- to temper the amorality of the market -- a point that, alas, seems to elude the Socialist soon-to-be masters of Hong Kong. KARL E. MEYER

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786
    I have dissected the "brothers" and biblebelievers website on many threads. I should allow some other inputs so you can see how Psyops or 'projection' works in our world these cretins abuse.

    "This report exposes agent-provocateurs who forge documents, edit Wikipedia biographies, revise histories to libel and discredit targeted opponents, and conspire to commit murder, including those of journalist/whistle-blowers, benefiting their CIA/FBI corporate handlers. This article documents how propaganda is administered today by COINTELPRO agents using the Internet, Wikipedia, and a "mix-it-all-up" strategy (i.e., the "Hegelian dialectic"). The agents co-create their celebrity, instigate and justify terrorism by generating religious and racial conflicts, cross-promote their divisive beliefs to generate controversies and social unrest, and divert attention from their criminal actions by projecting, through the media, their malice upon their targets.

    To effectively extend counter-intelligence and their PSYOPs (i.e., psychological operations), frightening truths are mixed with lies by these agent-provocateurs to undermine social and political activism.

    Wikipedia and Wiki-company has scores of journalists, political activists, and whistle-blowers protesting the company's use by disinformation agents. These agents are herein linked to a CIA/FBI counter-intelligence campaign. They have infiltrated, disrupted, marginalized, and/or subverted individuals and groups viewed as "dissidents." Activists protesting multi-national corporations, and their criminal control over politics and economics, are considered "subversives" to their COINTELPRO.


    This operation is reminiscent of J. Edgar Hoover's COINTELPRO, used to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of activists and their organized movements.

    The Wiki-entities that claim to allow users to add and update biographies, routinely prohibit COINTELPRO victims from making corrections to their bios plagued by disinformation posted by CIA/FBI "dark editors," identified below as agent provocateurs.

    Numerous victims prove Wikipedia and the Wiki Company routinely violates their "neutral point of view" policy, and their "non-profit" public service commission, by facilitating this CIA/FBI fraud to further operations exclusively benefiting "crisis capitalists," and/or satanists.

    The CIA/FBI-linked "dark editors," identified below, are herein exposed destroying biographies of celebrities, scientists, inventors, whistleblowers, journalists, activists and dissidents of mainstream politics and social movements. In this way, this COINTELPRO works to degenerate society, stifling innovation and progress in every field.

    Background

    Complaints that the Wiki-companies, and Wikimedia Foundation, has provided criminal cover for CIA/FBI counter-intelligence operators have been issued by dozens of organizations, journalists, and activists in recent months. The Wiki-editors have abused their public platform to control information, issue propaganda, discredit reputable authorities, degrade legitimate intelligence, suppress social movements, and generally confuse people.

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JsgSuERulw]


    The co-author of this report, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the Editor-in-Chief of Medical Veritas journal, advancing the528LOVERevolution, for example, was targeted by the agents exposed below. While being attacked himself, he received several requests from medical experts, scientists, and "BigPharma" whistleblowers to investigate a perceived criminal Wiki-COINTELPRO operation. Leaders from several organizations including the International Society of Orthomolecular Medicine (ISOM), and the World Organization for Natural Medicine (WONM), additionally complained. The ISOM issued an international alert (May 11, 2010; Orthomolecular Medicine News Service) informing members about the Wiki Foundation's fraud. The WONM, allied with the Sovereign Orthodox Order of Knights Hospitaller of St. John of Jerusalem, recorded the Wikipedia subversion of their humanitarian organizations, falsely tied by Wiki's "dark editors" to the Vatican, Jesuits, Jews/Zionists, and Knights of Malta, all demonized by the COINTELPRO agents.

    Wikipedia's Use for Social Engineering

    Evidence for psycho-social engineering through Wikipedia's yellow press is found in many places. For instance, its review of alternative medicine falsely implies the entire field is unscientific.

    Common sense suggests fraud. Since when is a whole field "unscientific," since science is applied to every field? Nutrition, for example, is a vital part of alternative medicine. When did the entire field of nutrition become unscientific? More importantly, who is served by this disinformation nonsense?

    Shedding light on the "dark editors" that Wikipedia encourages to violate common sense and experts' biographies on behalf of CIA/FBI corporate commissioners was difficult until recently. Proof of criminal operations surfaced involving CIA/FBI agent-provocateurs attempting to discredit Horowitz. These covert operators include Greg Szymanski and Eric Jon Phelps--journalists allied with Timothy Patrick White, "Dr. True Ott," Doug Millar, Xena Carpenter, and a few others. This group was found consistently communicating their advocacy for the famous FBI/CIA operative Ted Gunderson, who is among the nation's leading experts on pedophilia, satanic networks, and child-trafficking.

    The group of men are widely known as "brothers" in a religious cult called the "Bible Believers" that cross-promotes these agents, their theology, and activities. The "brothers" advance teachings of William Branham, memorialized by occult symbols on his "Christian" grave; and the Church of Satan leaders Anton LaVey and Michael Aquino. E-mails from Millar, White, and "True Ott" linked these men to numerous Internet articles featuring Gunderson's involvement in child-trafficking investigations, including allegations of his own involvements in this, the Church of Satan, and pedophilia.

    Wiki's lengthy list of persons targeted for character assassinations, including several celebrities, is labeled by the Phelps/Szymanski/CIA ring as "Masonic media agents." Altered biographies in Wikipedia libel and discredit these targets as "Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors," or "disinfo/distraction agents." Phelps and Szymanski's references tie them to a white racist anti-zionist satanic cult promoted by the "Bible Believers," their doctrines, and a leading PSYOPs expert, Michael A. Aquino.

    According to the writings of these men, common sense, and massive evidence published online by many reputable sources, Gunderson et al. serve Aquino, who has reorganized America's propaganda operations for US military intelligence in the spirit of satanism and his "Church of Set." His operatives administer COINTELPRO black-ops affecting targeted organizations and "dissidents" in every corner of society.

    Szymanski and Phelps, suspects in the recent murders of journalists Edward Harle of England, and Don Harkins in America, have been found to exert heavy control over Wiki's disinformation."

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bl.../2581360/posts
    Last edited by R_Baird; 03-12-2016 at 03:24 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786
    Contrary to what the "brothers" have to say.

    Here is a 1958 interview with Aldous Huxley warning people about the technological dangers, long before what we now can see so easily,

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TQZ-2iMUR0

    http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html

    Stephan Hoeller has these words to say about extreme early polemicists like those employed by Rome. He also correctly characterizes those who seek to point fingers rather than study. He correctly points our the early authors which are often quoting the Gospels could not in all honesty really say Gnostics were heretical because there was no orthodoxy.

    "The politicized view of Gnosticism continues to have its adherents, but these are increasingly recruited from the lunatic fringe. Gnostics are still represented as dangerous subversives in pulp magazines and obscure conspiracy pamphlets "exposing" Freemasons, Satanists, and other pests. Meanwhile, respectable conservative thinkers have dropped the Gnostic issue. Some, like scholar and former U.S. Senator S.I. Hayakawa, have subjected Voegelin and his theories to severe criticism and ridicule.

    Traditionalist Difficulties

    Another sometimes confusing voice comes from writers who are bent on proving that within the existing major religions a secret tradition of gnosis may be found which is not identical to the "heretical" Gnosticism of the early Christian centuries. In his 1947 work The Perennial Philosophy, Aldous Huxley promulgated a kind of gnosis that was in effect a mystery reserved for elites, revealed at the dawn of history and handed down through various religious traditions, where it still maintains itself in spite of its ostensible incompatibility with the official dogmas of those traditions. With this view, Huxley approximated the more radical position held by Traditionalists such as René Guénon and Frithjof Schuon.

    Huxley, on the other hand, never passed judgment on anyone who called himself a Gnostic. One could only wish the same could be said of other Traditionalists. Followers of Guénon (who, born a Catholic, converted to Islam in a somewhat untraditional manner) often castigate the early Gnostic teachers in a manner reminiscent of the more extreme ancient polemicists like Irenaeus or Tertullian. The Traditionalists' division of Gnostic writers into "false Gnostics" and "authentic Gnostics" reflects standards that are nothing if not arbitrary; contemporary research indicates that during the first three of four centuries A.D. there was as yet no true orthodoxy and thus no heresy either. Instead, many opinions on religious matters, including gnosis, flourished side by side. Certainly there were disagreements, but to arbitrarily extrapolate standards of falsity and authenticity from these polemics does not seem justified."
    Last edited by R_Baird; 03-14-2016 at 11:16 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786
    Sometimes it seems many animals are more wise and knowing than some humans. Yogi Ramacharaka (William Walker Atkinson) said domesticated animals can be more spiritually advanced than humans struggling all their lives to put food on their table.

    Do dogs and cats devise gods and alien interventions? Do they blindly accept what their masters tell them about history, politics and the right answers for tests?

    Yes, we can train a dog to do many things and there are some serious books showing women how to do this with or to their mates.

    But it is the field of hypnotic memes and icons where humans really jump the shark - at both ends. The so-called PTB (Powers that be) and the sheeple are both too enamoured by what can be done without considering reality could be so much more. We can create and make god or "all that IS" - better! There is no One Pie, despite what Malthus proposed.

    You do not have to steal from the rich to feed the poor or have negative income taxes and guaranteed minimum incomes. Yes, we can actually produce more with less man-hours, and it has been true with technology for many years, and far more true today.

    In short our true Salvation comes by thinking critically - and how can we get more people to do THAT?!!!!

    But there be monsters! If one reads enough of the myths one will wonder what is clear and how much "LIGHT" is shed into shadows created by the imagination of people wishing to lord it over others. The Gnosis or wisdom tree has too many branches and it needs pruning. When one person imagines a great and fearful beginning another person argues it and so on. Eventually you get a whole corpus of corpulence and flatulence, as I see it. Archons and immortals or angels and demons, worms and serpents all about hovering and flying; out of chaos! But somehow there was something other than chaos or it's original darkness which god created the firmament from. Yes, that darkness was actually a shadow of something else! It really became quite complex, all these people imagining an explanation for nonsense created by others, rather than observing reality - Nature!

    The names became power and able to hypnotize and make people behave according to what the priests liked. Machiavelli wrote a handbook on management still in use - Il Principe. In it he says if you give people what they want you can have a lot more, because people really only need a little. ""Appeals to base human urges" means you only have to give the "base" or most simple things and if you call those things a sin (Self-Inflicted Nonsense) you can even keep them as well. If I call my mighty omnipotent master by the name Allah and you call it some other name does that mean there is really more than one all powerful entity or reality?

    Absurd as it may sound - yes. We have made a heavenly host of monsters because we do not observe "What IS"!

    "When Pistis Sophia saw him moving in the depth of the waters, she said to him, “Youth, pass over here,” which is interpreted as “Yaldabaoth.” Since that day, the first principle of the word that referred to the gods and angels and people has appeared. And the gods and angels and people constitute that which came into being by means of the word. Moreover, the ruler Yaldabaoth is ignorant of the power of Pistis. He did not see her face, but he saw in the water the likeness that spoke with him. And from that voice he called himself Yaldabaoth. But the perfect ones call him Ariael because he was like a lion. And after he came to possess authority over matter, Pistis Sophia withdrew up to her light.

    YALDABAOTH CREATES HEAVEN AND EARTH AND BEARS THREE SONS

    When the ruler saw his greatness, he saw only himself; he saw nothing else, except water and darkness. Then he thought that he alone existed. His thought was made complete by means of the word, and it appeared as a spirit moving to and fro over the waters. And when that spirit appeared, the ruler separated the watery substance to one region and the dry substance to another region. From matter he created a dwelling place for himself and called it heaven. And from matter the ruler created a footstool and called it earth."


    http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/origin-Barnstone.html

    If Maya is not real and only science can make sense of our reality - we are truly screwed. Not to say that scientists are not our best option versus all the gurus, pulpit-pounders and politicians - but they only teach when they really are not good scientists. (Generality - I know)

    http://www.esotericonline.net/video/...s-of-deception

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Posts
    3,786
    If we do not plan for our future or listen to those who make it their business to see how to adapt to our changing circumstances - we are in trouble. I can use more flowery words for what we are in! Even if you are personally enlightened; your life is in danger and you should not fall in love or have children. Our ecological future will not even rise to the level of a true threat if we do not address the economic and religious underpinnings of our nations and laws. When I use the word enlightened I am not talking about a BELIEF - of any kind, manner, woof and warp.

    The Next Reformation: Why Evangelicals Must Embrace ...

    https://books.google.ca/books?isbn=1441206779

    Carl Raschke - 2004 - ‎Religion
    In the future the basic unit of human experience “is not the isolated individual, not ... Shock, in the early 1980s in Marilyn Ferguson's The Aquarian Conspiracy and John Naisbitt's Megatrends, and to a certain extent in what came to be called ...


    Human Resource Strategies for Organizations in Transition

    https://books.google.ca/books?isbn=1468457578

    R.J. Niehaus, ‎K.F. Price - 2012 - ‎Psychology
    Ferguson, M., "The Aquarian Conspiracy," J. P. Tarcher/St. Martins, 1970 Naisbitt, J., "Megatrends," Warner Communications, 1982. Toffler, A., "Future Shock," ...


    The Fortune Sellers: The Big Business of Buying and ...

    https://books.google.ca/books?isbn=0471358444

    William A. Sherden - 1999 - ‎Biography & Autobiography
    Alvin Toffler, author of Future Shcxk. 2. Mikhail Gorbachev, former head ... David Suzuki, television host and author of Inventing the Future. 4. Marilyn Ferguson, author of Aquarian Conspiracy. 5. ... John Naisbitt, author of Megatrends 2000. 7.


    The Active Society Revisited - Page 152 - Google Books Result

    https://books.google.ca/books?isbn=0742549151

    Wilson C. McWilliams - 2006 - ‎Literary Criticism
    Widely-read and representative works by Townsend, Ferguson, Naisbitt, Senge, and ... maintained in The Aquarian Conspiracy (1980) that corporate business was ... but as the very hub of political and cultural life in the post-industrial future.


    Sherden's full book can be viewed at the link above. Make sure you read the first chapter of "The Second Oldest Profession".

    https://books.google.ca/books?id=PIK...page&q&f=false
    Last edited by R_Baird; 04-06-2016 at 08:38 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •